Forest carbon projects in the Ukrainian Carpathians: an assessment of potential community impacts and benefits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2016.718Keywords:
community participation, conservation, equity, livelihoods, markets, policy, REDD , UkraineAbstract
Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+) is a frequently promoted climate change mitigation strategy. As forest carbon projects proceed, we are learning how they affect local sovereignty and resource access, particularly in developing economies. Central and Eastern Europe’s temperate forests offer potential for projects, yet little is known about how the sociopolitical context of these transitional economies may influence project success. In this article, we enhance understanding of potential community impacts and explore opportunities for fair benefit distribution in Ukraine’s Carpathian Mountain region. Through a thematic qualitative and interpretive analysis of interviews and observational data, we: (1) describe what community-level forest uses and tenure rights may be affected by forest carbon projects; and (2) explore the opportunities and obstacles of fair benefit distribution and community engagement in projects in the region. Our data show that local communities in the region are important forest-dependent stakeholders, relying on the forest for fuelwood, non-timber forest products, recreation, and other intangible benefits. This indicates the need for strong social safeguards in developing forest carbon projects. While no mechanisms exist for direct revenue sharing, communities could derive other benefits that improve the local social, economic, and ecological situation. Our results further suggest that lessons from projects in developing economies can be informative to project development in post-socialist, transitioning economies.References
Amato, A.J., 1998. In the wild mountains: Idiom, economy, and ideology among the Hutsuls, 1849 to 1939. Doctor of Philosophy Doctoral dissertation, Department of History, Indiana University, Bloomington, 411 p.
American Carbon Registry, 2010. The American carbon registry forest carbon project standard. Winrock International, Arlington, 70 p.
Asquith, N.M., Vargos Rio, M.T., Smith, J., 2002. Can forest-protection carbon projects improve rural livelihoods? Analysis of the Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project, Bolivia. Mitigation & Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7: 323-337. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024712424319
Blom, B., Sunderland, T., Murdiyarso, D., 2010. Getting REDD to work locally: Lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environmental Science & Policy 13: 164-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.01.002
Bray, D.B., Duran, E., Ramos, V.H., Mas, J., Velazquez, A., McNab, R.B., Barry, D., Radachowsky, J., 2008. Tropical deforestation, community forests, and protected areas in the Maya forest. Ecology and Society 13(2): 56. DOI: 10.5751/ES-02593-130256
Brown, K., Corbera, E., 2003. Exploring equity and sustainable development in the new carbon economy. Climate Policy 3S1: S41-S56.
CCBA, 2008. Climate, community & biodiversity project design standards second edition. CCBA, Arlington, 50 p.
Corbera, E., Brown, K., 2010. Offsetting benefits? Analyzing access to forest carbon. Environment and Planning A 42(7): 1739-1761. DOI: 10.1068/a42437
Corbera, E., Kosoy, N., Martínez Tuna, M., 2007. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: Case studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change 17(3-4): 365-380. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005
Diaz, D., Hamilton, K., Johnson, E., 2011. State of the forest carbon markets 2011: From canopy to currency. Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, D.C., 70 p.
Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P., 2007. Implementing sustainable forest management in Ukraine's Carpathian Mountains: The role of traditional village systems. Forest Ecology and Management 249(1-2): 28-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.003
Foellmi, H., Schwitter, R., 2009. Forest resource planning for people - with people: Two-level planning for sustainable natural resource managment. In Soloviy, I.P, Keeton, W.S. (ed.), Ecological economics and sustainable forest management: Developing a trans-disciplinary approach for the Carpathian Mountains. Ukrainian National Forestry University Press, Lviv, pp. 275-288.
Gibson, C.C., Williams, J.T., Ostrom, E., 2005. Local enforcement and better forests. World Development 33(2): 273-284. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.013
Goldstein, A., Gonzalez, G., 2014. Turning over a new leaf: State of the forest carbon markets 2014. Peters-Stanley, M. (ed.), Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, D.C., 87 p.
Hamrick, K., Goldstein, A., 2016. Raising ambition: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2016. Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, D.C., 50 p.
Hatcher, J., Bailey, L., 2011. Governance in the world's tropical forests: Where will REDD+ land? In Transparency International (ed.), Global corruption report: Climate change. Earthscan, London, pp. 315-326.
Irland, L.C., Kremenetska, E., 2009. Practical economics of forest ecosystem management: The case of the Ukrainian Carpathians. In Soloviy, I.P, Keeton, W.S. (ed.), Ecological economics and sustainable forest management: Developing a trans-disciplinary approach for the Carpathian Mountains. Ukrainian National Forestry University Press, Lviv, pp. 180-200.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M., 2014. Worldwide governance indicators: Country data report for Ukraine, 1996-2013. World Bank, Washington, D.C., 7 p.
Keeton, W.S., Angelstam, P., Baumflek, M., Bihun, Y., Chernyavskyy, M., Crow, S.M., Deyneka, A., Elbakidze, M., Farley, J., Kovalyshyn, V., Mahura, B., Myklush, S., Nunery, J.R., Soloviy, I.P., Zahvoyska, L., 2013. Sustainable forest management alternatives for the Carpathian Mountain region, with a focus on Ukraine. In Kozak, J., Ostapowicz, K., Bytnerowicz, A., Wyzga, B. (eds.) The Carpathians: Integrating nature and society towards sustainability. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 331-352. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_24
Kerchner, C.D., Keeton, W.S., 2015. California's regulatory forest carbon market: Viability for northeast landowners. Forest Policy and Economics 50: 70-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.005
Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., Polycarp, C., 2008. Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: A comparison of carbon offset standards. WWF Germany, Berlin, 105 p.
Kuemmerle, T., Chaskovskyy, O., Knorn, J., Radeloff, V.C., Kruhlov, I., Keeton, W.S., Hostert, P., 2009. Forest cover change and illegal logging in the Ukrainian Carpathians in the transition period from 1988 to 2007. Remote Sensing of Environment 113(6): 1194-1207. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.02.006
Kuemmerle, T., Olofsson, P., Chaskovskyy, O., Baumann, M., Ostapowicz, K., Woodcock, C.E., Houghton, R.A., Hostert, P., Keeton, W.S., Radeloff, V.C., 2011. Post-Soviet farmland abandonment, forest recovery, and carbon sequestration in western Ukraine. Global Change Biology 17(3): 1335-1349. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02333.x
Larson, A.M., Barry, D., Dahal, G.R., 2010. New rights for forest-based communities? Understanding processes of forest tenure reform. International Forestry Review 12(1): 78-96. DOI: 10.1505/ifor.12.1.78
Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G., 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CA, 416 p.
Marshall, C., Rossman, G.B., 2011. Designing Qualitative Research, 5th ed. SAGE Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C., 321 p.
Nordberg, M., 2007. Ukraine reforms in forestry 1990-2000. Forest Policy and Economics 9: 713-729. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.07.002
Olander, L.P., Galik, C.S., Kissinger, G.A., 2012. Operationalizing REDD+: Scope of reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4: 661-669. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.07.003
Ostrom, E., 1996. Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development 24(6): 1073-1087. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
Pagiola, S., Landell-Mills, N., Bishop, J., 2002. Making market-based mechanisms work for forests and people. In Pagiola, S., Bishop, J., Landell-Mills, N. (eds.), Selling forest environmental services: Market-based mechanisms for conservation and development. Earthscan, London, pp. 261-289.
Pettenella, D., Brotto, L., 2012. Governance features for successful REDD+ projects organization. Forest Policy and Economics 18: 46-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.09.006
REDD+ SES., 2010. REDD+ social & environmental standards. REDD+ SES, Washington, D.C., 16 p.
Rodríguez de Francisco, J.C., Budds, J., Boelens, R., 2013. Payment for environmental services and unequal resource control in Pimampiro, Ecuador. Society & Natural Resources 26(10): 1217-1233. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2013.825037
Rosa, H., Kandel, S., Dimas, L., 2004. Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: Lessons from the Americas. International Forestry Review 6(2): 187-194. DOI: 10.1505/ifor.6.2.187.38401
Sikor, T., 2003. The commons in transition: Agrarian and environmental change in Central and Eastern Europe. Environmental Management 34(2): 270-280. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-3007-5
Smith, J., Scherr, S.J., 2003. Capturing the value of forest carbon for local livelihoods. World Development 31(12): 2143-2160. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.011
Soloviy, I.P., Cubbage, F.W., 2007. Forest policy in aroused society: Ukrainian post-Orange Revolution challenges. Forest Policy and Economics 10(1-2): 60-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2007.05.003
Strochinskii, A.A., Pozyvailo, Y.M., Jungst, S.E., 2001. Forests and forestry in Ukraine: Standing on the brink of a market economy. Journal of Forestry 2001(August): 34-38.
Stryamets, N., Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P., 2012. Role of non-wood forest products for local livelihoods in countries with transition and market economy: Case studies in Ukraine and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27: 74-87. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2011.629622
Tacconi, L., Mahanty, S., Suich, H., 2013. The livelihood impacts of payments for environmental services and implications for REDD+. Society & Natural Resources 26(6): 733-744. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2012.724151
Transparency International., 2014. Corruption perceptions index 2014. Transparency International, Berlin, 9 p.
Zbinden, S., Lee, D.R., 2005. Paying for environmental services: An analysis of participation in Costa Rica's PSA program. World Development 33(2): 255-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.012
Published
Issue
Section
License
All the papers published in Annals of Forest Research are available under an open access policy (Gratis Gold Open Access Licence), which guaranty the free (of taxes) and unlimited access, for anyone, to entire content of the all published articles. The users are free to “read, copy, distribute, print, search or refers to the full text of these articles”, as long they mention the source.
The other materials (texts, images, graphical elements presented on the Website) are protected by copyright.
The journal exerts a permanent quality check, based on an established protocol for publishing the manuscripts. The potential article to be published are evaluated (peer-review) by members of the Editorial Board or other collaborators with competences on the paper topics. The publishing of manuscript is free of charge, all the costs being supported by Forest Research and Management Institute.
More details about Open Access:
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access
