Return of grey wolf (Canis lupus) to Central Europe: challenges and recommendations for future management in cultural landscapes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2018.1190Keywords:
Grey wolf, Canis lupus, Central Europe, re-colonization, conflicts, protection, managementAbstract
Grey wolf actually is immigrating Central Europe from eastern or southern populations, establishing packs and reproducing successfully. This development, starting in the beginning of the 2000s, led to an exponentialpopulation increase until today. The present paper analyzes re-colonization of Central Europe by Grey wolf (Canis lupus), considering ecological, socio-economical as well as socio-cultural aspects, and develops basic points for an exemplary management concept. Until today, wolf management especially in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, widely follows a passive “wait and see” strategy. Thus, predations of small livestock, cattle, and horses are quickly increasing. Especially farmers and herdsmen call for a more active way of wolf management. The Central European populations of mouflon (Ovis ammon musimon), being highly endangered in its natural range, are completely disappearing with the occurrence of wolf. Hunting of wild ungulates becomes more difficult whereas forest damages by barking and browsing are not significantly reduced by the influence of wolf predation. Maintaining biodiversity by preserving open landscapes by grazing might become more and more difficult. The present paper shows the need for a more active management concept, developed from a participatory process, locally differentiated and combining different management measures, as e.g. total protection, sustainable utilization, prevention of diseases, herd protection measures and others.References
Anonymous, 2016. Wolfsverursachte Schäden, Präventions- und Ausgleichszahlungen in Deutschland (2015). Dokumentations- und Beratungsstelle des Bundes zum Thema Wolf, 22 pages. Web: https://www.dbb-wolf.de/mehr/literatur-download/berichte-zu-praevention-und-nutztierschaeden. Accessed: 10.2018.
Anonymous, 2017. Wolfsverursachte Schäden, Präventions- und Ausgleichszahlungen in Deutschland (2016). Dokumentations- und Beratungsstelle des Bundes zum Thema Wolf, 29 pages. Web: https://www.dbb-wolf.de/mehr/literatur-download/berichte-zu-praevention-und-nutztierschaeden
Anonymous, 2018. Plan national d´actions 2018-2023 sur le loup et les activités d´élevage. Web: http://agriculture.gouv.fr/plan-national-dactions-2018-2023-sur-le-loup-et-les-activites-delevage-0Accessed: 10.2018.
Bradley E.H., Robinson H.S., Bangs E.E., Kunkel K., Jimenez M.D., Gude J.A., Grimm T., 2015. Effects of Wolf Removal on Livestock Depredation Recurrence and Wolf Recovery in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management 79: 1337-1346. DOI: 10.2193/2006-305
Brainerd S.M., Bangs E.E., Bradley E.H., Fontaine J.A., Hall W., Iliopoulos Y., Jimenez M.D., Jozwiak E.A., Liberg O., Mack C.M., Meier T.J., Niemeyer C.C., Pedersen H.C., Sand, H., Schultz, R. N., Smith, D. W., Wabakken, P., Wydeven, A. P. 2008. The Effects of Breeder Loss on Wolves. Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 89-98. DOI: 10.2193/2006-305
Brand C. J., Pybus M. J., Ballard W.B., Peterson R.O., 1995. Infectious and parasitic diseases of the grey wolf and their potential effects on wolf populations in North America. In: Carbyn, L.N. (ed.), Ecology and conservation of wolves in a changing world. Canadian Circumpolar Institute, Edmonton, pp. 419-429.
Creel S., Rotellea J.J., 2010. Meta-analysis of relationships between human offtake, total mortality and population dynamics of gray wolves (Canis lupus). PloS ONE 5: 1-7. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012918
Ellenberg H. 1978. Zur Populationsökologie des Rehes (Capreoluscapreolus L., Cervidae) in Mitteleuropa. Spixiana, ZoologischeStaatssammlung, Suppl. 2, 211 p.
Frank J. 2016. Nära vargar. Rekommendationer för hantering av situationer med vargarnära bos-tadshus eller männlskor. Viltskadecenter (lnstitutionen för ekologi, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet), 32 p.
Guber S., Herzog S., 2017. Die naturschutzrechtliche raum- und wirkungsbezogene Klassifikationssystematik von Arten sowie daraus folgende staatliche Handlungspflichten - erläutert an den Arten Mufflon (Ovis ammon musimon) und Wolf (Canis lupus). Natur und Recht 39: 73-88. DOI 10.1007/s10357-017-3133-0
Harper E.K., Paul W.J., Mech L.D., Weisberg S., 2008. Efectiveness of lethal, directed wolf depredation control in Minnesota. Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 778-784. DOI: 10.2193/2007-273
Herzog S., 2014. Mortalität durch Verkehrswege beim Wolf (Canis lupus) – ein Artenschutzproblem? Säugetierkundliche Informationen 9: 235-242.
Herzog S., 2016. Von Wölfen und Menschen: Für einen undogmatischen Umgang mit einem Heimkehrer. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung 41: 227-237.
Herzog S., Guber S., 2018. Der naturschutzrechtliche Populationsbegriff als Maßstab zur Beurteilung des Erhaltungszustandes einer Art gem. § 45 Abs. 7 S. 2 BNatschG erläutert am Beispiel des Wolfes (Canis lupus). Natur und Recht 40: 682-688. DOI 10.1007/s10357-018-3416-0
Herzog S., Schröpfer R., 2016. Das Mufflon Ovis ammon musimon (Pallas, 1811) in Europa: Faunenverfälschung oder Maßnahme der ex-situ-Generhaltung? Säugetierkundliche Informationen 10(52): 259-264.
Jędrzejewska, B., Jędrzejewski, W., Bunevich, A. N., Minkowski, L., Okarma, H. 1996. Population dynamics of Wolves Canis lupus in Biolowieża Primeval Forest (Poland and Belarus) in relation to hunting by humans, 1847-1993. Mammal Review 26: 103-126. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1996.tb00149.x
Kuzmin, I.V.; Botvinkin, A.D.; McElhinney, L.M.; Smith, J.S.; Orciari, L.A.; Hughes, G.J.; Fooks, A.R.; Rupprecht, C.E. 2004. Molecular epidemiology of terrestrial rabies in the former Soviet Union. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 40: 617–631. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-40.4.617
Lebreton J.-D., 2005. Dynamical and statistical models for exploited populations. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics 47(1): 49–63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2005.00371.x
Liberg O., Chapron G., Wabakken P., Pedersen H.C., Hobbs N.T., Sand H., 2011. Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 279: 910–915. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1275.
Lovari S., Sforzi A., Scala C., Fico R. 2007. Mortality parameters of the wolf in Italy: does the wolf keep himself from the door? University of Siena, Italy. Journal of Zoology 272, 117–124. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00260.x.
Mörner T., Eriksson H., Bröjer C., Nilsson K., Uhlhorn H., Ågren E., HårdafSegerstad C., Jansson D.S., Gavier-Widén D., 2005. Diseases and mortality in free-ranging Brown Bear (Ursus arctos), Gray Wolf (Canis lupus), and Wolverine (Gulo gulo) in Sweden. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 41(2): 298–303. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-41.2.298
Musiani M., Muhly T., Gates C., Callaghan C., Smith M.E., Thsoni E., 2005. Seasonality and reoccurrence of depredation and wolf control in western North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33: 876-887. DOI: 10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[876:SARODA]2.0.CO;2
Piegert H., Uloth W., 2000. Der Europäische Mufflon. DSV-Verlag, Hamburg.
Polster J.-U., Pfarre C., Herzog S., 2014. Möglichkeiten der olfaktorischen und akustischen Vergrämung des Wolfes (Canis lupus) an Verlehrswegen: Erste Ergebnisse einer Gehegestudie. Säugetierkundliche Informationen 9(48): 281-288.
Polster J.-U., Herzog S., 2014. Studies on deterrent agents for predator and prey species to avoid wildlife collisions along transport routes on the example of Grey wolf (Canis lupus) and Red deer (Cervus elaphus). Mammalian Biology 79S, 16.
Randi E., Hulva P., Fabbri E., Galaverni M., Galov A., Kusak J., Bigi D., Bolfíková B.Č., Smetanová M., Caniglia R. 2014. Multilocus detection of wolf x dog hybridization in Italy, and guidelines for marker selection. PLoS ONE 9(1): e86409. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086409
Riley S.J., Siemer W.F., Decker D.J., Carpenter L.H., Organ J.F., Berchielli L.T., 2003. Adaptive impact management: An integrative approach to wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 8: 81-95. DOI: 10.1080/10871200304301
Sidorovich V.E., Tikhomirova L.L., Jedrzejewska B., 2003. Wolf Canis lupus numbers, diet and damage of livestock in relation to hunting and ungulate abundance in northeastern Belarus during 1990-2000. Wildlife Biology 9: 103-111. DOI: 10.2981/wlb.2003.032
Sparkman A.M., Waits L.P., Murray D.L., 2011. Social and demographic effects of anthropogenic mortality: A test of the compensatory mortality: hypothesis in the Red wolf. PLoS ONE 6(6): e20868. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0020868.
Torres R.T., Silva N., Brotas G., Fonseca C., 2015. To eat or not to eat? The diet of the endangered Iberian Wolf (Canis lupus signatus) in a human-dominated landscape in Central Portugal. PloS One 10(6): e0129379. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129379.
Tsuda K., Kikkawa Y., Yonekawa H., Tanabe Y., 1997. Extensive interbreeding occured among multiple matriarchal ancestors during the domestication of dogs: Evidence from inter- and intraspecies polymorphisms in the D-loop region of mitochondrial DNA between dogs and wolves. Genes & Genetic Systems 72(4): 229-38. DOI: 10.1266/ggs.72.229
Von Holdt B.M., Cahill J.A., Fan Z., Gronau I., Robinson J., Pollinger J.P., Shapiro B., Wall J., Wayne R.K. 2016. Whole-genome sequence analysis shows that two endemic species of North American wolf are admixtures of the coyote and gray wolf. Science Advances 2(7): e1501714. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1501714
Vos J., 2000. Food habits and livestock depredation oft two Iberian wolf packs (Canis lupus signatus) in the north of Portugal. Journal of Zoology 251: 457-462. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00801.x
Wagner C., Holzapfel M., Kluth G., Reinhardt I., Ansorge H., 2012. Wolf (Canis lupus) feeding habits during the first eight years of its occurence in Germany. Mammalian Biology 77: 196-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2011.12.004
Wieglus R.B., Peebles K.A., 2014. Effects of wolf mortality on livestock depredations. PloS ONE 9(12):e113505. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113505
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All the papers published in Annals of Forest Research are available under an open access policy (Gratis Gold Open Access Licence), which guaranty the free (of taxes) and unlimited access, for anyone, to entire content of the all published articles. The users are free to “read, copy, distribute, print, search or refers to the full text of these articles”, as long they mention the source.
The other materials (texts, images, graphical elements presented on the Website) are protected by copyright.
The journal exerts a permanent quality check, based on an established protocol for publishing the manuscripts. The potential article to be published are evaluated (peer-review) by members of the Editorial Board or other collaborators with competences on the paper topics. The publishing of manuscript is free of charge, all the costs being supported by Forest Research and Management Institute.
More details about Open Access:
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access
