FORMEC 2017

Productivity assessment of timber harvesting techniques for supporting sustainable forest management of secondary Atlantic Forests in southern Brazil

Pedro Caldas Britto , Dirk Jaeger, Stephan Hoffmann, Renato Cesar Gonçalves Robert, Alfredo Celso Fantini, Alexander C. Vibrans

Pedro Caldas Britto
Department of Forest Work Science and Engineering, University of Göttingen, Germany. Email: pedro.britto@foresteng.uni-freiburg.de
Dirk Jaeger
Department of Forest Work Science and Engineering, University of Göttingen, Germany
Stephan Hoffmann
Department of Forest Work Science and Engineering, University of Göttingen, Germany
Renato Cesar Gonçalves Robert
Forestry & Wood Science Center, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Brazil
Alfredo Celso Fantini
Laboratory of Ecology and Management of Forest Ecosystems, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Brazil
Alexander C. Vibrans
Department of Forest Engineering. University of Blumenau, Brazil

Online First: November 27, 2017
Britto, P., Jaeger, D., Hoffmann, S., Robert, R., Fantini, A., Vibrans, A. 2017. Productivity assessment of timber harvesting techniques for supporting sustainable forest management of secondary Atlantic Forests in southern Brazil. Annals of Forest Research DOI:10.15287/afr.2017.898


The Atlantic Forest in southern Brazil has been subject to overexploitation in the past prompting the formulation of a rigorous conservation orientated policy by the government including a strict ban of timber harvesting. In the region, the forestland is owned by farmers. The economic value of the forest is rather limited for those farmers, because of the prohibition of commercial timber harvesting as a source of income. Sustainable forest management systems can offer great potential as new income opportunities for land holders, and further actively support the process of ecosystem rehabilitation and protection for these ecosystems. Yet, successful implementation of such sustainable management systems requires feasible and adapted timber harvesting systems. In order to develop such harvesting systems, a regional comparative case study was conducted at a typical smallholder forestry venture with the objective to analyze and evaluate harvesting methods supporting sustainable management of the Atlantic Forest. This study assessed production rates and associated costs of a common conventional timber harvesting method (CM) and a proposed alternative method (AM). CM was performed by a selected, typical forest landowner who had only basic training in chainsaw operations, but 20 years of experience at the wood yard of his small sawmill. In contrast, the AM employed a professional chainsaw operator from the Amazon forest, trained and experienced in reduced impact logging techniques using state of the art equipment, supplemented by a snatch block and a skidding cone for improved extraction. Time study based models identified tree volume, winching distance and skidding distance to the landing as the most significant independent variables affecting productivity. Total net productivity ranged from 4.9 m³ PMH0-1 for CM to 3.1 m³ PMH0-1 for AM. Corresponding gross-productivity ranged from 3.0 m³ SMH-1 to 1.9 m³ SMH-1 with an overall mean utilization rate of 60.8 % and 60.9 %, respectively for CM and AM. Associated harvesting costs ranged from 12.05 € m-3 to 20.94 € m-3 with an estimated annual production of 4000 m³ and 2700 m³, respectively. Although AM showed overall lower productivity and higher costs, it represented an important improvement in terms of occupational health and safety. In conclusion, a suitable harvesting system should integrate local experiences of CM and proposed technical improvements of AM.

Acar H.H., 2016. Log pulling sliding head to be used during cable skidding by drummed tractor. In: Gendek A., Moskalik T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 49° FORMEC symposium, 4-7 September 2016, Warsaw Poland. Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, pp. 23-25.

Ackerman P., Belbo H., Eliasson L., Jong A., Lazdins A., Lyons J., 2014. The COST model for calculation of forest operations costs. International Journal of Forest Engineering 25(1): 75–81. DOI: 10.1080/14942119.2014.903711

Alarcon G.G., Caporal D.S., Beltrame A.V., Karam K.F., 2011. Transformação da paisagem e uso dos recursos florestais na agricultura familiar: um estudo de caso em área de Mata Atlântica [Landscape change and the use of forest resources in family agriculture: a case study in the atlantic forest region]. Ciência Florestal 21: 369-380. DOI: 10.5902/198050983242

Alarcon G. G., Ayanu, Y., Fantini A. C., Farley J., Filho A. S., Koellner T., 2015. Weakening the Brazilian legislation for forest conservation has severe impacts for ecosystem services in the Atlantic Southern Forest. Land Use Policy 47: 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.011

ASABE, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2011. Agricultural machinery management data ASAE D4977. ASABE Standards, St. Joseph: 1-8.

Akay, E. A., Yilmaz, M., Tonguc, F., 2006. Impact of mechanized harvesting machines on forest ecosystem: Residual stand damage. Journal of Applied Sciences 6(11): 2414-2419. DOI: 10.3923/jas.2006.2414.2419

Bauch, S., Amacher, G., Merry, F., 2007. Costs of harvesting, transportation and milling in the Brazilian Amazon: Estimation and policy implications. Forest Policy and Economics 9(8): 903-915. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.07.004

Björheden R.; Thompson M. A., 2000. An international nomenclature for forest work study. In: Field D.B. (ed.), Proceeings of IUFRO 1995: 20th World Congress, 6-12 August 1995, Tampere Finland. University of Maine, Orono, pp. 190-215.

IBGE, 2012. Manual Técnico da Vegetação Brasileira. Série Manuais Técnicos em Geociências 1, 2ª edição revista e ampliada [Technical manual of Brazilian vegetation in technical manuals series of geosciences.]. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, 271 p.

Klein R.M., 1978. Mapa fitogeográfico do estado de Santa Catarina [Phytogeographic map of Santa Catarina state]. Herbário Barbosa Rodrigues 5: 1-24.

Koutsianitis D., Tsioras P., 2016. Time consumption and production costs of two small scale wood harvesting systems in northern Greece. Small Scale Forestry 16: 19-35. DOI: 10.1007/s11842-016-9340-3

Jourgholami M., 2012. Small scale timber harvesting: mule Logging in Hycranian forest. Small Scale Forestry 11: 255-262. DOI: 10.1007/s11842-011-9174-y

Fantini A.C., Siminski A., 2016. Manejo de florestas secundárias da Mata Atlântica para produção de madeira: possível e desejável [Management of secondary forests of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest for timber production: possible and desirable]. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação 13(32): 673-698. DOI: 10.21713/2358-2332.2016.v13.1013

Hoffmann S., Jaeger D., Schoenherr S., Lingenfelder M., Sun D., Zeng J., 2016. The effect of forest management systems on productivity and costs of cable yarding operations in the southern China. Forestry Letters 109: 11-24.

Hoffmann S., Jaeger D., Schoenherr S., Talbot B., 2015. Challenges in mechanization efforts of small diameter eucalyptus harvesting operations with a low capacity running skyline yarder in southern china. Forests 6(9): 2959-2981. DOI: 10.3390/f6092959

Holzleitner, F., Stampfer, K., Visser, R., 2011. Utilization rates and cost factors in timber harvesting based on long-term machine data. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 32(2): 501-508.

Lopes, E. S., Pagnussat, M. B., 2017. Effect of the behavioral profile on operator performance in timber harvesting. International Journal of Forest Engineering 62: 1-6. DOI: 10.1080/14942119.2017.1328847

Magagnotti N., Spinelli R., 2012. Good practice guidelines for biomass production studies. CNR Ivalsa, Sesto Fiorentino, 54 p.

Metzger J.P., 2009. Conservation issues in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biological Conservation 142(6): 1138-1140. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.012

Mousavi R., 2012. Time consumption productivity and cost analysis of skidding in the Hyrcanian forest in Iran. Journal of Forestry Research 23: 691–697. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-012-0265-1

Pandolfo, C., Braga H. J., Silva V. P., Massignan A. M., Pereira E.S., Thomé V.M.R., 2002. Atlas climatológico digital do Estado de Santa Catarina [Climatological atlas of Santa Catarina state]. EPAGRI, Florianópolis.

Picchio, R., Magagnotti, N., Sirna, A., Spinelli, R., 2012.Improved winching technique to reduce logging damage. Ecological Engineering 47: 83-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.037

Ribeiro M. C., Metzger J. P., Martensen A. C., Ponzoni F. J., Hirota M. M., 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 142(6): 1141-1153. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021

Sabogal C., Silva J. N. M., Zweede, J., Pereira Júnior R., Barreto P., Guerreiro C. A., 2000. Diretrizes técnicas para a exploração de impacto reduzido em operações florestais de terra firme na Amazônia Brasileira [Technical Guidelines for the reduced impact logging in the Brazilian Amazon Forest.]. Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém, 52 p.

Silva W. G., Metzger J. P., Simões S., Simonetti C., 2007. Relief influence on the spatial distribution of the Atlantic Forest cover at the Ibiúna Plateau. Brazilian Journal of Biology 67(3): 403–411. DOI: 10.1590/S1519-69842007000300004


No Supplimentary Material available for this article.
No metrics available for this article.