Neighbourhood-based evidence of tree diversity promotion by beech in an old-growth deciduous-coniferous mixed forest (Eastern Carpathians)

Authors

  • Dan Gafta Cluj-Napoca University of Babes-Bolyai
  • Annik Schnitzler Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Environnements Continentaux, Université de Lorraine, Metz
  • Déborah Closset-Kopp Unité Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens
  • Vasile Cristea Cluj-Napoca University of Babes-Bolyai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2020.2143

Keywords:

auto-facilitation, beech-fir-spruce mixed forest, diversity accumulator, neighbourhood effect, null models, self-competitor, spatial point pattern, tree species mingling

Abstract

Neighbourhood models are useful tools for understanding the role of positive and negative interactions in maintaining the tree species diversity in mixed forests. Under such a presumption, we aimed at testing several hypotheses concerning the mechanisms of autogenic species coexistence in an old-growth, beech-fir-spruce stand, which is part of the Slătioara forest reserve (eastern Carpathians). Univariate/bivariate spatial point pattern analyses, the individual tree species-area relationship, the species mingling analysis and generalised linear mixed models of neighbour interference were applied on data concerning the position and allometry of all saplings and trees occurring within a 0.24 ha plot.The monospecific distribution of either beech or spruce saplings did not support the spatial segregation hypothesis. There was no evidence of conspecific negative distance dependence, as no spatial segregation was detected between the saplings and trees of any species. Within 4 m-neighbourhood, the beech saplings appeared as diversity accumulators, which might be indicative of indirect facilitation (e.g., herd protection hypothesis). At tree stage, none of the three species showed either accumulator or repeller patterns in their neighbourhood with respect to sapling species richness. Signals of positive and negative interspecific association were found in tree-sized beech (at scales of 10 to 20 m) and spruce (at scales of 4 to 17 m), respectively. The former, highly interspersed pattern is in accordance with the hypothesis of positive complementary effects, whereas the latter, poorly intermingled pattern is probably linked to the unexpected, positive neighbouring effect of spruce trees on the stem growth of their conspecific saplings. Such self-favouring process might be due to a facilitative below-ground mechanism. Conversely, the beech saplings were suppressed through interference from the neighbouring conspecific trees.The beech appears to be the key promoter of tree species coexistence in the study forest stand, in contrast to the low interspersion of spruce in the overstorey leading to lower local tree diversity.

References

Akashi N., 1996. The spatial pattern and canopy-understory association of trees in a cool temperate, mixed forest in western Japan. Ecological Research 11: 311-319.Arii K., Lechowicz M.J., 2002. The influence of overstory trees and abiotic factors on the sapling community in an old-growth Fagus-Acer forest. Ecoscience 9: 386-396.Baddeley A., Diggle P.J., Hardegen A., Lawrence T., Milne R.K., Nair G., 2014. On tests of spatial pattern based on simulation envelopes. Ecological Monographs 84: 477-489.Baddeley A., Rubak E., Turner R., 2015. Spatial Point Patterns: Methodology and Applications with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton.Baddeley A., Rubak E., Turner R., 2020. Spatial point pattern analysis, model-fitting, simulation, tests. R package ‘spatstat’ v1.64-1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spatstat/spatstat.pdfBai X., Queenborough S.A., Wang X., Zhang J., Li B., Yuan Z., Xing D., Lin F., Ye J., Hao Z., 2012. Effects of local biotic neighbors and habitat heterogeneity on tree and shrub seedling survival in an old-growth temperate forest. Oecologia 170: 755-765.Bândiu C., 1977. Lumina ca factor stabilizator al compoziției ecosistemelor de amestec de brad cu fag. In: Preda V. (ed.), Pădurea și spațiile verzi în actualitate și perspectivă. Academia RSR, Cluj-Napoca, pp. 73-82.Becker M., Drapier J., 1984. Rôle de l’allélopathie dans les difficultés de régénération du sapin (Abies alba Mill.). I Propriétés phytotoxiques des hydrosolubles d’aiguilles de sapin. Acta Oecologica 5: 347-356.Becker M., Drapier J., 1985. Rôle de l’allélopathie dans les difficultés de régénération du sapin (Abies alba Mill.). II Étude des lessivats naturels de feuillage, de litière et d’humus. Acta Oecologica 6: 31-40Bennett J.A., Maherali H., Reinhart K.O., Lekberg Y., Hart M.M., Klironomos J., 2017. Plant-soil feedbacks and mycorrhizal type influence temperate forest population dynamics. Science 355: 181-184.Blundell A.G., Peart D.R., 2004. Density-dependent population dynamics of a dominant rain forest canopy tree. Ecology 85: 704-715.Bolker B.M., Brooks M.E., Clark C.J., Geange S.W., Poulsen J.R., Stevens M.H.H., White J.S.S., 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 127-135.Bolte A., Kampf F., Hilbrig L., 2013. Space sequestration below ground in old-growth spruce-beech forests – signs for facilitation? Frontiers in Plant Science 4: 322.Bosela M., Tobin B., Seben V., Petras R., Larocque G.R., 2015. Different mixtures of Norway spruce, silver fir, and European beech modify competitive interactions in central European mature mixed forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 45: 1577-1586.Bulleri F., Bruno J., Silliman B.R., Stachowicz J.J., 2016. Facilitation and the niche: implications for coexistence, range shifts, and ecosystem functioning. Functional Ecology 30: 70-78.Cammarano M., 2011. Co-dominance and succession in forest dynamics: the role of interspecific differences in crown transmissivity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 285: 46-57.Canham C.D., 1988. Growth and canopy architecture of shade-tolerant trees: the response of Acer saccharum and Fagus grandifolia to canopy gaps. Ecology 69: 786-795.Canham C.D., Le Page P.T., Dave C.K., 2004. A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition: effects of shading versus crowding. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 778-787.Catovsky S., Bazzaz F.A., 2002. Feedbacks between canopy composition and seedling regeneration in mixed conifer broad-leaved forests. Oikos 98: 403-420.Cavard X., Bergeron Y., Chen H.Y.H., Pare D., Laganiere J., Brassard B., 2011. Competition and facilitation between tree species change with stand development. Oikos 120: 1683-1695.Cenușă R., Popa C., Teodosiu M., 2002. Cercetări privind relaţia structură-funcţie şi evoluţia ecosistemelor forestiere naturale din nordul ţării. Analele ICAS 45: 9-19.Chave J., Muller-Landau H.C., Levin S.A., 2002. Comparing classical community models: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. American Naturalist 159: 1-23.Chen L., Mi X.C., Comita L.S., Zhang L.W., Ren H.B., Ma K.P., 2010. Community-level consequences of density dependence and habitat heterogeneity in a subtropical broad-leaved forest. Ecology Letters 13: 695-704.Chesson P., 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 343-366.Chi X., Tang Z., Xie Z., Guo Q., Zhang M., Ge J., Xiong G., Fang J., 2015. Effects of size, neighbors, and site condition on tree growth in a subtropical evergreen and deciduous broad­leaved mixed forest, China. Ecology and Evolution 5: 5149-5161.Comita L.S., Muller-Landau H.C., Aguilar S., Hubbell S.P., 2010. Asymmetric density dependence shapes species abundances in a tropical tree community. Science 329: 330-332.Comita L.S., Queenborough S.A., Murphy S.J., Eck J.L., Xu K.Y., Krishnadas M., Beckman N., Zhu Y., 2014. Testing predictions of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence for distance- and density-dependent seed and seedling survival. Journal of Ecology 102: 845-856.Das A.J., Battles J.J., van Mantgem P.J., Stephenson N.L., 2008. Spatial elements of mortality risk in old-growth forests. Ecology 89: 1744-1756.de la Cruz M., 2020. Individual diversity-area relationships. R package ‘idar’ v1.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/idar/idar.pdfDiaci J., Rozenbergar D., Anic I., Mikac S., Saniga M., Kucbel S., Visnjic C., Ballian D., 2011. Structural dynamics and synchronous silver fir decline in mixed old-growth mountain forests in Eastern and Southeastern Europe. Forestry 84: 479-491.Diaci J., Rozenbergar D., Boncina A., 2010. Stand dynamics of Dinaric old-growth forest in Slovenia: are indirect human influences relevant? Plant Biosystems 144: 194-201.Diggle P.J., 2010. Nonparametric methods. In: Gelfand A.E., Diggle P.J., Fuentes M., Guttorp P. (eds.), Handbook of Spatial Statistics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 299-316.Dobrowolska D, 1998. Structure of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) natural regeneration in the ‘Jata’ reserve in Poland. Forest Ecology and Management 110: 237-247.Dobrowolska D., Veblen T.T., 2008. Treefall-gap structure and regeneration in mixed Abies alba stands in central Poland. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 34-69.Doniță N., Chiriță C., Stănescu V. (eds.), 1990. Tipuri de ecosisteme forestiere din România. Centrul de Material Didactic și Propagandă Agricolă, București.Duduman G., Roibu C.C., Duduman M.L., Miron-Onciul M., 2010. The influence of competition and dimensional-spatial characteristics of trees on their radial growth in old-growth Slătioara forest, Romania. AES Bioflux 2: 215-230.Duduman G., Tomescu C., Drăgoi M., Palaghianu C., 2014. Variabilitatea dimensională a arborilor şi diversitatea florei vasculare în amestecuri de răşinoase cu fag din rezervaţia Codrul secular Slătioara. Bucovina Forestieră 14: 135-147.Espinosa C., Cruz M., Jara-Guerrero A., Gusmán E., Escudero A., 2015. The effects of individual tree species on species diversity in a tropical dry forest change throughout ontogeny. Ecography 39: 329-337.Forrester D.I., Bauhus J., 2016. A review of processes behind diversity-productivity relationships in forests. Current Forestry Reports 2: 45-61.Fox J.F., 1977. Alternation and coexistence of tree species. American Naturalist 111: 69-89.Getzin S., Wiegand T., Wiegand K., He F.L., 2008. Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands. Journal of Ecology 96: 807-820.Gilbert B., Lechowicz M.J., 2004. Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 7651-7656.Gravel D., Beaudet M., Messier C., 2008. Partitioning the factors of spatial variation in regeneration density of shade-tolerant tree species. Ecology 89: 2879-2888.Harms K.E., Condit R., Hubbell S.P., Foster R.B., 2001. Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. Journal of Ecology 89: 947-959Heiri C., Wolf A., Rohreb L., Bugmann H., 2009. Forty years of natural dynamics in Swiss beech forests: structure, composition, and the influence of former management. Ecological Applications 19: 1920-1934.Hiura T., Fujiwara K., 1999. Density-dependence and co-existence of conifer and broad-leaved trees in a Japanese northern mixed forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 843-850.Hou J., Mi X., Liu C., Ma K., 2004. Spatial patterns and associations in a Quercus-Betula forest in northern China. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 407-414.Hubbell S.P., 2006. Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. Ecology 87: 1387-1398.Hurtt G.C., Pacala S.W., 1995. The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, history and competitive differences between plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology 176: 1-12.Illian J.B., Penttinen A., Stoyan H., Stoyan D., 2008. Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Janík D., Adam D., Hort L., Král K., Šamonil P., Unar P., Vrška T., 2014. Tree spatial patterns of Abies alba and Fagus sylvatica in the Western Carpathians over 30 years. European Journal of Forest Research 133: 1015-1028.Janík D., Král K., Adam D., Hort L., Šamonil P., Unar P., Vrška T., McMahon S., 2016. Tree spatial patterns of Fagus sylvatica expansion over 37 years. Forest Ecology and Management 375: 134-145.Johnson D.J., Bourg N.A., Howe R., McShea W.J., Wolf A., Clay K., 2014. Conspecific negative density-dependent mortality and the structure of temperate forests. Ecology 95: 2493-2503.Jonášová M., Prach K., 2004. Central-European mountain spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests: regeneration of tree species after a bark beetle outbreak. Ecological Engineering 23: 15-27.Keren S., Motta R., Govedar Z., Lucic R., Medarevic M., Diaci J., 2014. Comparative structural dynamics of the Janj mixed old-growth mountain forest in Bosnia and Herzegovina: are conifers in a long-term decline? Forests 5: 1243-1266.King D.A., Wright S.J., Connell J.H., 2006. The contribution of interspecific variation in maximum tree height to tropical and temperate diversity. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22: 11-24.Klopcic M., Jerina K., Boncina A., 2010. Long-term changes of structure and tree species composition in Dinaric uneven-aged forests: are red deer an important factor? European Journal of Forest Research 129: 277-288.Kotanen P.M., 2007. Effects of fungal seed pathogens under conspecific and heterospecific trees in a temperate forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 85: 918-925.Koukoulas S., Blackburn G.A., 2005. Spatial relationships between tree species and gap characteristics in broad-leaved deciduous woodland. Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 587-596.Kraft N., Adler P., Godoy O., James E., Fuller S., Levine J.M., 2015. Community assembly, coexistence, and the environmental filtering metaphor. Functional Ecology 29: 592­599.Kuang X., Yuan Z., Lin F., Ye J., Wang X., Wang Y., Hao Z., 2017. Conspecific density dependence and community structure: insights from 11 years of monitoring in an old-growth temperate forest in Northeast China. Ecology and Evolution 7: 5191-5200.Kuninaga T., Hirayama K., Sakimoto M., 2015. Negative canopy-understorey interaction shapes the sapling bank of Fagus crenata in a cool-temperate, conifer-hardwood mixed forest. Plant Ecology 216: 1191-1202.Kunstler G., Falster D., Coomes D.A., Hui F., Kooyman R.M., Laughlin D.C., Poorter L., Vanderwel M., Vieilledent G., Wright S.J., Aiba M., Baraloto C., Caspersen J., Cornelissen J.H.C., Gourlet-Fleury S., Hanewinkel M., Herault B., Kattge J., Kurokawa H., Onoda Y., Peñuelas J., Poorter H., Uriarte M., Richardson S., Ruiz-Benito P., Sun I.-F., Ståhl G., Swenson N.G., Thompson J., Westerlund B., Wirth C., Zavala M.A., Zeng H., Zimmerman J.K., Zimmermann N.E., Westoby M., 2016. Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition. Nature 529: 204­207.Laliberté E., Paquette A., Legendre P., Bouchard A., 2009. Assessing the scale-specific importance of niches and other spatial processes on beta diversity: a case study from a temperate forest. Oecologia 159: 377-388.Lasky J.R., Uriarte M., Boukili V.K., Chazdon R.L., 2014. Trait­mediated assembly processes predict successional changes in community diversity of tropical forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111: 5616-5621.Lieberman M., Lieberman D., 2007. Nearest-neighbor tree species combinations in tropical forest: the role of chance, and some consequences of high diversity. Oikos 116: 377-386.Loosmore N.B., Ford E.D., 2006. Statistical inference using the G or K point pattern spatial statistics. Ecology 87: 1925-1931.Mina M., del Río M., Huber M.O., Thürig E., Rohner B., 2018. The symmetry of competitive interactions in mixed Norway spruce, silver fir and European beech forests. Journal of Vegetation Science 29: 775-787.Nagel T., Svoboda M., Diaci J., 2006. Regeneration patterns after intermediate wind disturbance in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest in southeastern Slovenia. Forest Ecology and Management 226: 268-278.Nagel T.A., Svoboda M., Rugani T., Diaci J., 2010. Gap regeneration and replacement patterns in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Plant Ecology 208: 307-318.Nakashizuka T., Kohyama T., 1995. The significance of the asymmetric effect of crowding for coexistence in a mixed temperate forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 509-516.Orman O., Szewczyk J., 2015. European beech, silver fir, and Norway spruce differ in establishment, height growth, and mortality rates on coarse woody debris and forest floor - a study from a mixed beech forest in the Western Carpathians. Annals of Forest Science 72: 955-965.Pacala S.W., Levin S.A., 1997. Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species. In: Tilman D., Kareiva P. (eds.), Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 204-232.Paluch J., Bartkowicz L., Moser W.K., 2019. Interspecific effects between overstorey and regeneration in small-scale mixtures of three late-successional species in the Western Carpathians (southern Poland). European Journal of Forest Research 138: 889-905.Paluch J., Gruba P., 2012. Effect of local species composition on topsoil properties in mixed stands with silver fir (Abies alba Mill.). Forestry 85: 413-426.Paluch J., Kołodziej Z., Skrzyszewski J., Bartkowicz L., Gruba P., 2016. Regeneration patterns of the late-successional Abies alba Mill.: inhibition in monospecific stands and colonization in mixed stands. Annals of Forest Science 73: 1015-1024.Paluch J.G., Jastrzębski R., 2013. Natural regeneration of shade-tolerant Abies alba Mill. in gradients of stand species compositions: limitation by seed availability or safe microsites? Forest Ecology and Management 307: 322-332.Parobeková Z., Pittner J., Kucbel S., Saniga M., Filípek M., Sedmáková D., Vencurik J., Jaloviar P., 2018. Structural diversity in a mixed spruce-fir-beech old-growth forest remnant of the western Carpathians. Forests 9: 379.Peters H.A., 2003. Neighbour-regulated mortality: the influence of positive and negative density dependence on tree populations in species-rich tropical forests. Ecology Letters 6: 757-765.Petrițan I.C., Commarmot B., Hobi M.L., Petrițan A.M., Bigler C.H., Abrudan I.V., Rigling A., 2015. Structural patterns of beech and silver fir suggest stability and resilience of the virgin forest Șinca in the Southern Carpathians, Romania. Forest Ecology and Management 356: 184-195.Piao T., Comita L.S., Jin G., Kim J.H., 2013. Density dependence across multiple life stages in a temperate old-growth forest of northeast China. Oecologia 172: 207-217.Pommerening A., Grabarnik P., 2019. Individual-Based Methods in Forest Ecology and Management. Springer, Cham.Pommerening A., Uria-Diez J., 2017. Do large forest trees tend towards high species mingling? Ecological Informatics 42: 139-147.Poulson T.L., Platt W.J., 1996. Replacement patterns of beech and sugar maple in Warren Woods, Michigan. Ecology 77: 1234-1253.Pretzsch H., 2014. Canopy space filling and tree crown morphology in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures. Forest Ecology and Management 327: 251-264.Pretzsch H., Block J., Dieler J., Dong P.H., Kohnle U., Nagel J., Spellmann H., Zingg A., 2010. Comparison between the productivity of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech along an ecological gradient. Annals of Forest Science 67: 712.Pretzsch H., Schutze G., 2016. Effect of tree species mixing on the size structure, density, and yield of forest stands. European Journal of Forest Research 135: 1-22.Punchi-Manage R., Wiegand T., Wiegand K., Getzin S., Huth A., Gunatilleke C., Gunatilleke I., 2015. Neighborhood diversity of large trees shows independent species patterns in a mixed dipterocarp forest in Sri Lanka. Ecology 96: 1823-1834.R Core Team, 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/Rajala T., 2019. Segregation measures for multitype spatial point patterns. R package ‘spatialsegregation’ v2.45. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spatialsegregation/spatialsegregation.pdfRamage B.S., Mangana I.J., 2017. Conspecific negative density dependence in American beech. Forest Ecosystems 4: 8.Rayburn A., Wiegand T., 2012. Individual species-area relationships and spatial patterns of species diversity in a Great Basin, semi‐arid shrubland. Ecography 35: 341-347.Rothe A., Binkley D., 2001. Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31: 1855-1870.SAS Institute Inc., 2014. SAS/STAT® 13.2 User’s Guide. SAS Institute, Cary.Schnitzler A., Closset D., Gafta D., Cristea V., Schwoehrer C., 2004. Dynamique des populations et mosaïque forestière en hêtraie-sapinière naturelle préservée. Une comparaison entre Vosges et Carpates. Revue d’Écologie (Terre et Vie) 59: 213-229.Šebková B., Šamonil P., Valtera M., Adam D., Janík D., 2012. Interaction between tree species populations and windthrow dynamics in natural beech-dominated forest, Czech Republic. Forest Ecology and Management 280: 9-19.Simon A., Gratzer G., Sieghardt M., 2011. The influence of windthrow microsites on tree regeneration and establishment in an old growth mountain forest. Forest Ecology and Management 262: 1289-1297.Stăncioiu P.T., O’Hara K.L., 2006. Regeneration growth in different light environments of mixed species, multiaged, mountainous forests of Romania. European Journal of Forest Research 125: 151-162.Stoll P., Prati D., 2001. Intraspecific aggregation alters competitive interactions in experimental plant communities. Ecology 82: 319-327.Swamy V., Terborgh J., Dexter K.G., Best B.D., Alvarez P., Cornejo F., 2011 Are all seeds equal? Spatially explicit comparisons of seed fall and sapling recruitment in a tropical forest. Ecology Letters 14: 195-201.Szewczyk J., Szwagrzyk J., 1996. Tree regeneration on rotten wood and on soil in old-growth stand. Plant Ecology 122: 37-46.Szwagrzyk J., Szewczyk J., Maciejewski Z., 2012. Shade-tolerant tree species from temperate forests differ in their competitive abilities: a case study from Raztocze, south-eastern Poland. Forest Ecology and Management 282: 28-35.Thelin G., Rosengren U., Callesen I., Ingerslev M., 2002. The nutrient status of Norway spruce in pure and in mixed-species stands. Forest Ecology and Management 160: 115-125.Tsai C.H., Lin Y.C., Wiegand T., Nakazawa T., Su S.H., Hsieh C.H., Ding T.S., 2015. Individual species-area relationship of woody plant communities in a heterogeneous subtropical monsoon rainforest. PloS One 10: e0124539.Uriarte M., Condit R., Canham C.D., Hubbell S.P., 2004. A spatially explicit model of sapling growth in a tropical forest: does the identity of neighbours matter? Journal of Ecology 92: 348-360.Vázquez D.P., Melián C.J., Williams N.M., Blüthgen N., Krasnov B.R., Poulin R., 2007. Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos 116: 1120-1127.Volkov I., Banavar J.R., He F., Hubbell S.P., Maritan A., 2005. Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests. Nature 438: 658-661.Vrška T., Adam D., Hort L., Kolář T., Janík D., 2009. European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) rotation in the Carpathians - a developmental cycle or a linear trend induced by man? Forest Ecology and Management 258: 347-356.Wagner R.G., Radosevich S.R., 1998. Neighborhood approach for quantifying interspecific competition in coastal Oregon forests. Ecological Applications 8: 779-794.Wang X., Wiegand T., Hao Z., Li B., Ye J., Lin F., 2010. Species associations in an old-growth temperate forest in north-eastern China. Journal of Ecology 98: 674-686.Weiner J., 1984. Neighbourhood interference amongst Pinus rigida individuals. Journal of Ecology 72: 183-195.Wiegand T., Gunatilleke C.V.S., Gunatilleke I.A.U.N., Huth A., 2007. How individual species structure diversity in tropical forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 19029-19033.Wiegand T., Martinez I., Huth A., 2009. Recruitment in tropical tree species: revealing complex spatial patterns. American Naturalist 174: 106-140.Wiegand T., Moloney K.A., 2014. Handbook of Spatial Point-Pattern Analysis in Ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Wills C., Condit R., Foster R.B., Hubbell S.P., 1997. Strong density- and diversity-related effects help to maintain tree species diversity in a neotropical forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 94: 1252-1257.Wilson J.B., 2011. The twelve theories of co-existence in plant communities: the doubtful, the important and the unexplored. Journal of Vegetation Science 22: 184-195.Woods K.D., 1979. Reciprocal replacement and the maintenance of codominance in a beech-maple forest. Oikos 33: 31-39.Woods K.D., 1984. Patterns of tree replacement: canopy effects on understory pattern in hemlock-northern hardwood forests. Vegetatio 56: 87-107.Wright S.J., 2002. Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130: 1-14.Zhang C., Zhao X., Gadow K., 2010. Partitioning temperate plant community structure at different scales. Acta Oecol 36: 306-313.Zhou Q., Shi H., Shu X., Xie F., Zhang K., Zhang Q., Dang H., 2019. Spatial distribution and interspecific associations in a deciduous broad-leaved forest in north-central China. Journal of Vegetation Science 30: 1153-1163.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-28

Issue

Section

Research article